Ex Parte Squires’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 636 So. 2d 415 - Ex Parte Board of Zoning Adjustment · 470 So. 2d 1194 - Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc. · 608 So. 2d 391 - Marvin's, Inc. v. Robertson · 682 So. 2d 52 - Ex Parte Northport Health Service, Inc. · Landers v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “The trial court heard this case without a jury. Where evidence is presented to the trial court ore tenus, the court’s findings of fact are presumed correct; its findings will not be disturbed except for a plain and palpable abuse of discretion.” ’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, . . . if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he gravamen of th[e] action concerned the actions of officials in interpreting and enforcing the statute and regulations, not the constitutionality of the statutes or regulations themselves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.