Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 SO2D 9 - Talucci v. Matthews

Talucci v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pan American World Airways v. Gregory · Wilhelm v. South Indian River Co. · Russ v. Gilbert · Watson v. Seat & Crawford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defaulted defendant has the right to contest the amount of unliquidated damages and may offer evidence in mitigation thereof.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The right to contest unliquidated damages in any negligence action encompasses the right to challenge the causal relationship between the damages claimed and the liability established by the default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.