Profill Development, Inc. v. Dills’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6901 (Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992) · 42 U.S.C. § 6929 · 42 U.S.C. § 6941
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Perry v. Sindermann · Mistretta v. United States · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TDEC] has the knowledge, expertise and experience and is charged with the administration of the technical details of the statute. Accordingly, [TDEC’s] decisions concerning the applicability of technical terms of the statute are entitled to deference in the same manner as other technical decisions. Wayne County v. Solid Waste Disposal Control Board, 756 S.W.2d 274, 279-280 (Tenn. Ct.App.1988).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.