Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 SW2D 339 - Pedraza v. Crossroads Security Systems

Pedraza v. Crossroads Security Systems’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Bounds v. Smith · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc. · Ex parte Hull

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that in some exceptional cases, the public and private interests at stake are such that the administration of justice may be best served by appointing a lawyer to represent an indigent civil litigant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “His application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum contains no basis or argument for granting it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re ZLT

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.