Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 960 SW2D 680 - State v. Consaul

State v. Consaul’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2011

3 state decisions

10199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 171st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Stansbury v. California · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Michigan v. Jackson · Romero v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the manifestation of probable cause, combined with other circumstances, would lead a reasonable person to believe that he is under restraint to the degree associated with an arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.