Carranza v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Gardner v. State (2009), Rozell v. State (2005)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. State · Jones v. Kelley · Reyes v. State · Dugard v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant must present the motion for new trial to the trial court within 10 days of filing it, unless the trial court in its discretion permits it to be presented and heard within 75 days from the date when the court imposes or suspends sentence in open court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Amaro v. State · Gardner v. State“The order attached to the motion [for new trial], labeled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Gardner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.