Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 961 F.2d 1358 - McDaniel v. Al Lockhart

McDaniel v. Al Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis

961 F.2d 1358 · 1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
December 1999
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. Sullivan · Hobbs v. Al Lockhart · McDaniel v. State · McDaniel v. State · Hall v. Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must review the totality of the facts in the case and the fairness of the whole trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No due process violation exists for the admission of prior bad acts testimony unless it can be said that the testimony was "so conspicuously prejudicial or of such magnitude that it fatally infected the trial and deprived [defendant] of fundamental fairness."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.