Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 961 F.2d 138 - United States v. Shell

United States v. Shell’s Empirical Analysis

961 F.2d 138 · 1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1542 · 18 U.S.C. § 3291

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Smith v. Hooey · United States v. Loud Hawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The length of delay is a 'threshold' factor. If 'presumptively prejudicial,' the length of delay necessitates an examination of the other three factors. The delay is measured from the time of the indictment to the time of trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.