Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 961 F.2d 694 - Maulding v. Sullivan

Maulding v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

961 F.2d 694 · 1992

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital (1994), Wooten v. Farmland Foods (1995)

19 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

480199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Latimer v. Stainer · Geders v. United States · Jasany v. United States Postal Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “being regarded as having such an impairment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.