United States v. Haddock’s Empirical Analysis
961 F.2d 933 · 1992
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Richardson v. United States · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Wrenn v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant was an executive officer of the bank, (2) the bank was connected in some way to the Federal Reserve System, (3) the defendant willfully misapplied the funds of the bank, and (4) the defendant acted with the intent to injure or defraud that bank.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“nevertheless must address the defendant's claim that evidence presented at trial on the reversed count was insufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patterson v. Haskins“to be convicted under § 656, a defendant need not have made a false statement or representation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.