United States v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis
961 F.2d 972 · 1992
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Sepulveda (1993), United States v. Brandon (1994)
44 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · Nagac v. Derwinski · Brower v. United States · United States v. Petrozziello · Burnley v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here are few aspects of a jury trial where we would be less inclined to disturb a trial judge's exercise of discretion, absent clear abuse, than in ruling on challenges for cause in the empanelling of a jury.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“willfully fail[s] to appear, as ordered, for a judicial proceeding.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whether ... evidentiary exhibits properly admitted should or should not accompany the jury to the jury room is a discretionary matter for the trial court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.