Michel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1385
Relies on Cooksey v. State · Pistro v. State · State v. Clark · 77 Wash. App. 333 - State v. Gave · State v. Rigoulot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the underlying premise of Pistro is that visitors-including unsolicited visitors-can be expected to use normal means to approach a residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State“as legitimate a societal purpose as any other undertaking that would normally take a person to another's front door.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.