Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 961 P.2d 472 - Bohrer v. DeHart

Bohrer v. DeHart’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably People v. Dunlap (1999), Bohrer v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. (1998)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co. · 346 So. 2d 1012 - Lawrence v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. · Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBose · People v. Shinaut · Boryla v. Pash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We defer to jury verdicts when jurors have been properly instructed and the record contains evidence to support the jury's findings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'rectifies the inequity caused by the common law rule of joint and several liability whereby any one responsible party could have been liable for all losses which the plaintiff incurred”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[N]o error or defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict or for vacating, modifying or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice. The court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.