¶1AFFIRMED. See State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (holding “[t]he trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator’s motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).
961 So. 2d 1043
State v. Gilchrist
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 20, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-07-20
Relies on 835 So. 2d 259 - State v. Carter
Decided 2007-07-20