961 So. 2d 198 - Baugh v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Commonwealth v. Brown (2012), Patrick v. State (2012)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · 732 So. 2d 1065 - Banks v. State · 90 So. 2d 629 - Davis v. State · 722 So. 2d 177 - Donaldson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Circumstantial evidence is proof of certain facts and circumstances from which the [jury] may infer that the ultimate facts in dispute existed or did not exist.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The purpose of a motion for judgment of acquittal is to test the legal sufficiency of the evidence presented by the [S]tate. Harris v. State, 954 So.2d 1260, 1261 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2007). The Florida Supreme Court has held that there is “sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Baugh v. State, 961 So.2d 198, 204 (Fla.2007).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holland v. Tucker“involves the admission of pretrial statements as substantive evidence under the child victim hearsay exception in section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (2001), after the child recanted the pretrial statements during her in-trial testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.