Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 961 So. 2d 229 - Williamson v. State

961 So. 2d 229 - Williamson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Ring v. Arizona · Jones v. State · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Newly discovered evidence meets this standard if "it weakens the case against [the defendant] so as to give rise to a reasonable doubt as to his culpability" . . . The assessment also considers whether the evidence goes to the merits of the case or whether it constitutes impeachment evidence. The trial court should also determine whether this evidence is cumulative to other evidence in the case. The trial court should further consider the materiality and relevance of the evidence and any inconsistencies in the newly discovered evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “This Court does not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on issues of fact when competent, substantial evidence supports the circuit court's factual findings. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.