Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

961 S.W.2d 933

Ballesteros v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-02-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2004

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/961/sw2d/933 · .json · Public domain