Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 962 F.2d 1043 - Datascope Corp. v. SMEC, Inc.

Datascope Corp. v. SMEC, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

962 F.2d 1043 · 1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2019

1 federal appellate ·

120199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Hughey v. United States · Adams v. Gould Inc. · Gould, Inc., Et Al. v. Adams Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] party may amend the party’s pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in the absence of any apparent or declared reason — such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [or] futility of amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Datascope must have known from the outset of this litigation that if it prevailed and recovered damages for lost profits, the judgment would far exceed the amount that SMEC appeared able to pay,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.