Ginett v. Computer Task Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 1085 · 1992
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank (1995), Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc. (1997)
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1254 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Carnegie v. United States · Catlin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) multiple claims or multiple parties ..., (2) at least one claim, or the rights and liabilities of at least one party, must be finally decided within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and (3) the district court must make “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay” and expressly direct the clerk to enter judgment.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an express determination that there is no just reason for delay”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`ends the litigation [of that claim] on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment' entered on that claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Payroll Exp. Corp. · Ellis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.