Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 962 F.2d 1218 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

962 F.2d 1218 · 1992

Citation profile

257
cited by 257 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

168 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 257 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably United States v. Carroll (1994), United States v. Layne (1999)

168 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

1910199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Griffin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 257 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'in the light most likely to support the district court's decision.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “factual findings made in consideration of a motion to suppress evidence are to be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous [while] the district court's conclusions of law are subject to de novo review on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.