United States v. Feigenbaum’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 230 · 1992
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably United States v. Lai-Moi Leung (1994), United States v. Rodgers (1996)
19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Commissioner v. Engle · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · United States v. Arnett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonably understood to preclude the Government from opposing an attempt to have the sentence reduced after it had been imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to make no recommendation at the time of sentencing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.