United States v. Criollo’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 241 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2016
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Briggs Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. · United States v. McElroy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It strikes us as far better to try to have such disputes resolved by read-backs, rather than to end up with a hung jury, a mistrial and another trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e all know that juries not infrequently get into sharp disputes--whether the trial be long or short--as to the testimony of one or more witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.