United States v. Apple’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 335 · 1992
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Bell (1993), United States of America v. Keith Andre McAllister (2001)
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Burke · United States v. Suarez · United States v. Rush · United States v. Apple
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our remand instructions ... concerned only the propriety of enhancements for weapon possession....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“possession of the weapon during the commission of the offense is all that is needed to invoke the [weapon] enhancement. ... [W]hen the offense committed is conspiracy, [any geographical and temporal] proximity conditions are met when the weapon is discovered in a place where the conspiracy was carried out or furthered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]o the extent that the sentences may have been incorrect, our sense was that they could have been so only with respect to the enhancements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.