Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 962 F.2d 394 - Black v. Collins

Black v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

962 F.2d 394 · 1992

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Drinkard v. Johnson (1996), Byrd v. Collins (2000)

38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

680199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Townsend v. Sain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contrary to what the federal district court appears to have thought, a state court's ultimate conclusion that counsel rendered effective assistance is not a fact finding to which a federal court must grant a presumption of correctness under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “demonstrate that the issues [he raises] are subject to debate among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner; or that the questions are worthy of encouragement to proceed further.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.