Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 962 F.2d 465 - United States v. All Star Industries

United States v. All Star Industries’s Empirical Analysis

962 F.2d 465 · 1992

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
November 2015
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably United States v. Calverley (1994), In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation (2010)

32 federal appellate · 1 district ·

250199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal 'are not reviewable by this [c]ourt unless they involve purely legal questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “convicted of participating in a single continuing conspiracy that began more than five years before the indictment was returned, but which did not end until ... a time within”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “certainly ... did not constitute an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.