United States v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 560 · 1992
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Davis · United States v. Houser · United States v. Rivers · United States v. Ali · United States v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in fulfillment of the career offender provision. See United States v. Brown, 962 F.2d 560 , 565 (7th Cir.1992) (because determining whether particular offenses are part of a common scheme or plan is often a”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]rior sentences imposed in unrelated cases are to be counted separately.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The instant offense's conviction is a felony that is a crime of violence-armed bank robbery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.