Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 F.2d 6

Docket No. 91-7318.

Bostic v. State Judicial Officials

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 31, 1991 Decided: May 11, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-05-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Hirsch-Chemie Limited v. The Johns Hopkins University

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-561-HC-H)

Charles Sonny Bostic, Petitioner Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Charles Sonny Bostic seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bostic v. State Judicial Officials, No. CA-91-561HC-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13 and 25, 1991).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We also deny Bostic's motions for an injunction and for a "statement on the evidence or proceedings."

/962/f2d/6 · .json · Public domain