Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 F.2d 6

Docket No. 92-6174.

David Bright v. James N. Rollins, Warden John Sandstrom

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 14, 1992 Decided: May 21, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-05-21

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2000

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hirsch-Chemie Limited v. The Johns Hopkins University

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-2546-N)

David Bright, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bright v. Rollins, No. CA-91-2546-N (D. Md. Jan. 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/962/f2d/6 · .json · Public domain