Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 F.2d 6

Docket No. 92-6019.

Gantt v. Ford

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 1992 Decided: May 21, 1992

Relies on Hirsch-Chemie Limited v. The Johns Hopkins University

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-1254-JH)

George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

George W. Gantt appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gantt v. Ford, No. CA-91-1254-JH (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/962/f2d/6 · .json · Public domain