Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 F.2d 6

Docket No. 92-6088.

Johnson v. Liller

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 1992 Decided: May 15, 1992

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Hirsch-Chemie Limited v. The Johns Hopkins University

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-15

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Mark Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Susan Slenker Brewer, Joseph Ferretti, Steptoe & Johnson, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

William Mark Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing several, but not all, causes of action in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) suit. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

¶2

Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/962/f2d/6 · .json · Public domain