Fawcett v. Bablitch’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 617 · 1992
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably Garlotte v. Fordice (1995), Valentine v. Konteh (2005)
14 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Hamling v. United States · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · United States v. Cruikshank · Peyton v. Rowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a straight due process case in which the accused contends that inadequate notice led to a trial with an unacceptable risk of convicting the innocent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Lindler · Hartman v. Lee“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hartman v. Lee“notice and an opportunity to respond. Notice must be sufficient to make the opportunity useful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Lindler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.