Howard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 651 · 1992
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2019
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United State v. Morgan · McNally v. United States · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb · Union Bank v. Wolas · United States v. Keane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless a petitioner can show that he ... suffers from ongoing civil disabilities, or adverse collateral consequences, due to his ... allegedly wrongful conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“presents questions that could not have been resolved at the time of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.