Wilson v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis
962 F.2d 817 · 1992
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Laws v. Armontrout, Warden · Laws v. Armontrout
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel's representation [falls] below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Odem v. Hopkins“falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Odem v. Hopkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.