962 F. Supp. 2d 122 - Bernstein v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2339A (§ 120005 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 22 U.S.C. § 2221 · 22 U.S.C. § 2227 · 22 U.S.C. § 2378B (Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006) · 22 U.S.C. § 2378C · 22 U.S.C. § 5202 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fear arising from a foreign policy, no matter how severe a plaintiff's disagreement with that foreign policy may be, cannot constitute injury[ ]in[ ]fact without a concrete harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“subjective fear of surveillance does not give rise to standing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.