Carrillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · 642 So. 2d 542 - Abshire v. State · 691 So. 2d 1180 - Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no magic words or incantations are required, and that substance must control over form. The trial court's quest is not to create a perfect script, but to assure that peremptory challenges are not used to exclude persons from jury service for improper reasons”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the trial court implicitly underwent a genuineness inquiry and found the State's proffered reason to be non-pre-textual”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“I object. He's a man. She wants to get more women on the jury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.