962 So. 2d 1068 - Hebert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California v. Hodari D. · 75 So. 2d 291 - Melton v. State · 475 So. 2d 671 - State v. Ramsey · 620 So. 2d 1242 - Hollinger v. State · 533 So. 2d 285 - Kyser v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) A purpose or intention to effect an arrest under a real or pretended authority; (2) An actual or constructive seizure or detention of the person to be arrested by a person having present power to control the person arrest; (3) A communication by the arresting officer to the person whose arrest is sought, of an intention or purpose then and there to effect an arrest; and (4) An understanding by the person whose arrest is sought that it is the intention of the arresting officer then and there to arrest and detain him."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“told Hebert he was under arrest and instructed him to put down the gun.... [R]ather than comply, Hebert exited the residence and pointed the gun at the deputy, who fired two shots. Hebert fled into a nearby home that was under construction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.