¶1Earl Coney, Lake City, pro se.
¶2No appearance required for appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Affirmed. Although we have considered the merits of this appeal, which are nonexistent, we remind Mr. Coney of the admonition we gave in the June 7, 2007, order in Coney v. McDonough, case No. 4D07-813, that this court may preclude him from filing any further pro se pleadings, petitions, appeals, motions, or any other papers, because of his abuse of the appellate system.
¶5SHAHOOD, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.