¶1AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
¶2See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 45, Ala. R.App. P.; Ex *835parte Fann, 810 So.2d 631 (Ala.2001); Lamb v. Lamb, 939 So.2d 918 (Ala.Civ.App.2006); L.L.M. v. S.F., 919 So.2d 307 (Ala.Civ.App.2005); Headrick v. Headrick, 916 So.2d 610 (Ala.Civ.App.2005); Mann v. Mann, 725 So.2d 989 (Ala.Civ.App.1998); I.M. v. J.P.F., 668 So.2d 843 (Ala.Civ.App.1995); and Clemons v. Clemons, 627 So.2d 431 (Ala.Civ.App.1993).
¶3dissenting.
¶4I conclude that the juvenile court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over what appears to be a custody dispute between two parents. Consequently, in accordance with my special writing in J.W.J. v. P.K.R., 906 So.2d 182, 188-92 (Ala.Civ.App.2005) (Murdock, J., concurring in part and concurring in the result in part), and this court’s opinion in Ex parte K.L.P., 868 So.2d 454 (Ala.Civ.App.2003), I respectfully dissent.