Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 S.W.2d 464

Stipp v. Meadows

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-03-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2001

2 state decisions

Relies on City of St. Louis v. Hughes · Brooks v. Director of Revenue

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PREWITT, Judge.

¶1Following jury trial, the jury returned a verdict adverse to Plaintiffs’ claims for personal injuries following an automobile collision. Plaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal recites that the verdict and judgment were entered on February 18, 1997. Attached to the Notice of Appeal are docket sheets indicating that trial commenced on February 18, and ended on February 20, when the verdict was returned. The transcript confirms these dates. There is nothing in the docket sheets remotely resembling a judgment nor any entry on the docket sheets indicating a judgment was separately entered.

¶2Under Rule 81.12(a), a legal file should always contain the judgment if that order is appealed from. Here, there is none. Under Rule 74.01(a), for there to be a judgment, it must be (1) in writing; (2) signed by the judge; (3) denominated “judgment”; and (4) filed. Brooks v. Director of Revenue, 954 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Mo.App.1997). See also City of St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850*465(Mo.banc 1997). None of these requirements were met. Absent a judgment and the record does not show such, this Court does not have jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Brooks, supra.

¶3The appeal is dismissed.

GARRISON, P.J., and CROW, J., concur.
/962/sw2d/464 · .json · Public domain