Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

962 S.W.2d 955

State v. Pilger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-03-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2014

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of sexual abuse in the first degree in violation of section 566.100 RSMo.1994. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

/962/sw2d/955 · .json · Public domain