Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 F.2d 1347 - Patrick A. Casey, P.A. v. Hochman

Patrick A. Casey, P.A. v. Hochman’s Empirical Analysis

963 F.2d 1347 · 1992

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably Calder v. Job (1992), In Re: Wayne Bell Jr

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

140199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Everett v. Judson · Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Ass'n · Moulthrope v. Matus · Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Hillblom (In Re Continental Air Lines, Inc.)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In general, property . . . subsequently acquired by the debtor does not become property of the estate, but, rather, becomes the debtor's personal property, clear of all claims that are discharged in the bankruptcy case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]ny interest in property that the estate acquires after the commencement of the case”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.