Dove III Nl v. Atlantic Capital Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
963 F.2d 15 · 1992
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Black v. Lane (1994), Shimer v. Fugazy (1992)
14 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nixon · Cobbledick v. United States · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Tiller v. NCNB Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]pon motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought, accompanied by a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, and for good cause shown, the court in which the action is pending ... may-make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including ... that the disclosure or discovery not be had ... [or] that the disclosure or discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“general rule ... that only a citation for contempt, not the imposition of sanctions, is necessary for appellate review”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o penalty has been imposed, and the contempt order remains merely a finding, without judgment thereon, subject to modification, prior to judgment. Since the contempt finding ... is not a final decision, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § ... 1291.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.