Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 F.2d 255 - United States v. Hines

United States v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis

963 F.2d 255 · 1992

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
11
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 6 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Hendricks v. Vasquez (1992), Whittlesey v. State (1995)

34 federal appellate · 6 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 11 states

510199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · McNeil v. Wisconsin · Michigan v. Jackson · Maine v. Moulton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[aln exception to the offense-specific requirement of the Sixth Amendment occurs when the pending charge is so inextricably intertwined with the charge under investigation that the right to counsel for the pending charge cannot constitutionally be isolated from the right to counsel for the uncharged offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) there was a break in custody between the first and second interviews, and (2) the district court found that Hines knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel at the second interview.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the place, time, and persons involved were all different”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.