Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 F.2d 264 - Scholar v. Pacific Bell

Scholar v. Pacific Bell’s Empirical Analysis

963 F.2d 264 · 1992

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Goldsmith v. City of Atmore (1993), Graham-Humphreys v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc. (2000)

46 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions

6301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. · Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · United States v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to exercise due diligence in preserving his legal rights.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f a charge filed with the Commission pursuant to subsection (b) of this section is dismissed by the Commission ... the Commission ... shall so notify the person aggrieved and within ninety days after the giving of such notice a civil action may be brought against the respondent named in the charge....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The language of the statute establishes the 90-day period as running from the 'giving of such notice' rather than from the date claimant actually 'receives' notice in hand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.