Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 F.2d 316 - Meeks v. Singletary

Meeks v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis

963 F.2d 316 · 1992

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
May 2013
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Brecheen v. Reynolds (1994), Bolender v. Singletary (1994)

17 federal appellate ·

190199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Townsend v. Sain · Murray v. Carrier · McCleskey v. Zant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is well established that a habeas petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim if he or she alleges facts that, if proved at the hearing, would entitle petitioner to relief.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. White v. Singletary · Bolender v. Singletary
  2. “[t]he mere occurrence of a full and fair hearing in the state court ... does not neutralize petitioner's right to an evidentiary hearing in federal court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hardwick v. Crosby · Bolender v. Singletary
  3. “discern exactly which claims the Florida Supreme Court identified as procedurally defaulted [and][w]ith respect to these claims ... consider whether [Meeks] can demonstrate either cause and prejudice for his default, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice [under Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 , 750, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2565, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991) ],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Meeks v. Moore

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.