Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 F.2d 367

Docket No. 92-6256.

Faulk v. Watson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 4, 1992 Decided: May 22, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-05-22

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Gibson v. Webb

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-05-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-89-115-CRT-BO)

Alfonzo Faulk, Appellant Pro Se.

Ronna Dawn Gibbs, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Alfonzo Faulk appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Faulk v. Watson, No. CA-89-115-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/963/f2d/367 · .json · Public domain