Putnam v. DeRosa’s Empirical Analysis
963 F.2d 480 · 1992
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2015
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Randall v. Loftsgaarden · My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc. · International Fidelity Insurance v. Wilson · Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp. · K-Mart Corporation v. Oriental Plaza Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Three different circumstances may give rise to a right to indemnification. First, an express agreement may create a right to indemnification. Second, a contractual right to indemnification may be implied from the nature of the relationship between the parties. Third, a tort-based right to indemnification may be found where there is a great disparity in the fault of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.