United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
963 F.2d 693 · 1992
Citation profile
42 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Cardenas (1993), United States v. Krout (1995)
42 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Bourjaily v. United States · United States v. Di Re
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of the party's cause. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the basis of the witnesses' 'demeanor and candor, or lack thereof' and contradictions in the witnesses' testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fairman v. Anderson“creates a credibility question for the district court to resolve,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.