Rodriguez v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
963 F.2d 799 · 1992
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Mark Anthony Harris Michael Hegmann Janet Boyd Rose James (1999), Piotrowski v. City of Houston (1995)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Owens v. Okure · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a ‘person is prevented from exercising his legal remedy by the pendency of legal proceedings, the time during which he is thus prevented should not be counted against him in determining whether limitations have barred his right.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the moment the plaintiff becomes aware that he has suffered an injury or has sufficient information to know that he has been injured.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.