Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 F.2d 839 - United States v. Knipp

United States v. Knipp’s Empirical Analysis

963 F.2d 839 · 1992

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
5
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Lloyd (1993), 21 Cal. 4th 737 - People v. Frazer (1999)

60 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

6501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Carnegie v. United States · Bibby v. United States · Collins v. Youngblood · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allowed ... [the] overdrafts to continue and that he facilitated the kite to cover them because the overdrafts amounted to huge, unauthorized loans beyond the single customer legal lending limits....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the credibility of any witness has to be weighed along with all of the evidence in the case and to make that determination based on the evidence in the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that defendant personally benefitted from his scheme to defraud the financial institution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.